Key Differences
In short — Core i9-14900F outperforms the cheaper Core i7-8700K on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i7-8700K is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-14900F is 2286 days newer than the cheaper Core i7-8700K.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-8700K
- Up to 61% cheaper than Core i9-14900F - $152.09 vs $387.52
- Up to 46% better value when playing New World than Core i9-14900F - $1.42 vs $2.62 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-14900F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i9-14900F
- Performs up to 38% better in New World than Core i7-8700K - 164 vs 119 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-8700K - 32 vs 12 threads
New World
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Oct 5th, 2017
FPS
119
72%
Value, €/FPS
€1.42/FPS
100%
Price, €
€168.82
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €168.82 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 19326 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
FPS
164
100%
Value, €/FPS
€2.62/FPS
54%
Price, €
€430.15
39%
FPS Winner
Buy for €430.15 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 19324 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Oct 5th, 2017
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-8700K | vs | Intel Core i9-14900F |
---|---|---|
Oct 5th, 2017 | Release Date | Jan 8th, 2024 |
Core i7 | Collection | Core i9 |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 24 |
12 | Threads | 32 |
3.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.0 GHz |
4.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.8 GHz |
95 W | TDP | Not Available |
14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
37.0x | Multiplier | 20.0x |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |