Key Differences
In short — Core i9-13900F outperforms the cheaper Core i7-8700K on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i7-8700K is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-13900F is 1917 days newer than the cheaper Core i7-8700K.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-8700K
- Up to 58% cheaper than Core i9-13900F - $134.54 vs $318.06
- Up to 41% better value when playing Far Cry 3 than Core i9-13900F - $1.01 vs $1.72 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-13900F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i9-13900F
- Performs up to 39% better in Far Cry 3 than Core i7-8700K - 205 vs 148 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-8700K - 32 vs 12 threads
Far Cry 3
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 5th, 2017
FPS
148
72%
Value, €/FPS
€1.01/FPS
100%
Price, €
€149.34
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €149.34 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 202 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
FPS
205
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.72/FPS
58%
Price, €
€353.05
42%
FPS Winner
Buy for €353.05 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 201 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 5th, 2017
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-8700K | vs | Intel Core i9-13900F |
---|---|---|
Oct 5th, 2017 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
Core i7 | Collection | Core i9 |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 24 |
12 | Threads | 32 |
3.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.0 GHz |
4.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.6 GHz |
95 W | TDP | Not Available |
14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
37.0x | Multiplier | 20.0x |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |