Key Differences
In short — Core i7-8700K outperforms the cheaper Celeron G1610 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G1610 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-8700K is 1767 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G1610.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-8700K
- Performs up to 1% better in Tom Clancy's Ghost Recon Wildlands than Celeron G1610 - 190 vs 189 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1610 - 12 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1610
- Up to 82% cheaper than Core i7-8700K - $27.05 vs $152.09
- Up to 82% better value when playing Tom Clancy's Ghost Recon Wildlands than Core i7-8700K - $0.16 vs $0.89 per FPS
- Consumes up to 42% less energy than Intel Core i7-8700K - 55 vs 95 Watts
Tom Clancy's Ghost Recon Wildlands
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for €168.82 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 6602 minutes ago
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
FPS
189
99%
Value, €/FPS
€0.16/FPS
100%
Price, €
€30.03
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €30.03 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 6602 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 5th, 2017
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-8700K | vs | Intel Celeron G1610 |
---|---|---|
Oct 5th, 2017 | Release Date | Dec 3rd, 2012 |
Core i7 | Collection | Celeron |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Ivy Bridge |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 2 |
12 | Threads | 2 |
3.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.6 GHz |
4.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
95 W | TDP | 55 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
37.0x | Multiplier | 26.0x |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD |
Yes | Overclockable | No |