Key Differences
In short — Core i7-8700K outperforms the more expensive Ryzen Threadripper 1950X on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i7-8700K is 56 days newer than the more expensive Ryzen Threadripper 1950X.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-8700K
- Performs up to 11% better in Dirt 5 than Ryzen Threadripper 1950X - 189 vs 170 FPS
- Up to 79% cheaper than Ryzen Threadripper 1950X - $127.96 vs $599.06
- Consumes up to 47% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X - 95 vs 180 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-8700K - 32 vs 12 threads
Dirt 5
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Buy for €142.04 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 76371 minutes ago
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
FPS
170
89.94708994708994%
Value, €/FPS
Price, €
€664.96
21%
Buy for €664.96 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 76372 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Oct 5th, 2017
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
Single-Core
1171
74.02022756005057%
Multi-Core
7539
100%
Intel Core i7-8700K | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X |
---|---|---|
Oct 5th, 2017 | Release Date | Aug 10th, 2017 |
Core i7 | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Whitehaven |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 16 |
12 | Threads | 32 |
3.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
4.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 180 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
37.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |