Key Differences
In short — Core i5-2500K outperforms the cheaper Core i7-870 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i7-870 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-2500K is 488 days newer than the cheaper Core i7-870.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-870
- Up to 63% cheaper than Core i5-2500K - $73.12 vs $197.41
- Up to 63% better value when playing Deathloop than Core i5-2500K - $0.48 vs $1.3 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-2500K - 8 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i5-2500K
- Performs up to 1% better in Deathloop than Core i7-870 - 169 vs 168 FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-870 doesn't have integrated graphics
Deathloop
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 8th, 2009
FPS
168
99.40828402366864%
Value, €/FPS
€0.48/FPS
100%
Price, €
€81.16
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €81.16 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 52152 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 9th, 2011
FPS
169
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.3/FPS
36.92307692307692%
Price, €
€219.13
37%
FPS Winner
Buy for €219.13 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 52152 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 8th, 2009
Desktop • Jan 9th, 2011
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-870 | vs | Intel Core i5-2500K |
---|---|---|
Sep 8th, 2009 | Release Date | Jan 9th, 2011 |
Core i7 | Collection | Core i5 |
Lynnfield | Codename | Sandy Bridge |
Intel Socket 1156 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 4 |
8 | Threads | 4 |
2.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
3.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 95 W |
45 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
22.0x | Multiplier | 33.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 3000 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |