Key Differences
In short — Core i5-10400 outperforms the cheaper Core i7-870 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i7-870 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-10400 is 3887 days newer than the cheaper Core i7-870.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-870
- Up to 21% cheaper than Core i5-10400 - $73.12 vs $92.0
- Up to 13% better value when playing Elden Ring than Core i5-10400 - $0.73 vs $0.84 per FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i5-10400
- Performs up to 10% better in Elden Ring than Core i7-870 - 122 vs 111 FPS
- Consumes up to 32% less energy than Intel Core i7-870 - 65 vs 95 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-870 - 12 vs 8 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-870 doesn't have integrated graphics
Elden Ring
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Buy for €81.16 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 140 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
122
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.84/FPS
86%
Price, €
€102.12
79%
FPS Winner
Buy for €102.12 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 141 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Sep 8th, 2009
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-870 | vs | Intel Core i5-10400 |
---|---|---|
Sep 8th, 2009 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Core i7 | Collection | Core i5 |
Lynnfield | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket 1156 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 6 |
8 | Threads | 12 |
2.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
3.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 65 W |
45 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
22.0x | Multiplier | 29.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
No | Overclockable | No |