Key Differences
In short — Core i7-870 outperforms the cheaper FX-6200 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-6200 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-870 is 902 days older than the cheaper FX-6200.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-870
- Performs up to 1% better in Red Dead Redemption 2 than FX-6200 - 149 vs 148 FPS
- Consumes up to 24% less energy than AMD FX-6200 - 95 vs 125 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-6200 - 8 vs 6 threads
Advantages of AMD FX-6200
- Up to 57% cheaper than Core i7-870 - $31.32 vs $73.12
- Up to 57% better value when playing Red Dead Redemption 2 than Core i7-870 - $0.23 vs $0.54 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-870 doesn't have integrated graphics
Red Dead Redemption 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Buy for €81.16 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 207 minutes ago
Buy for €34.77 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 207 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Sep 8th, 2009
Desktop • Feb 27th, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-870 | vs | AMD FX-6200 |
---|---|---|
Sep 8th, 2009 | Release Date | Feb 27th, 2012 |
Core i7 | Collection | FX |
Lynnfield | Codename | Zambezi |
Intel Socket 1156 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 3 |
8 | Threads | 6 |
2.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
3.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.1 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 125 W |
45 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
22.0x | Multiplier | 19.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) |
No | Overclockable | Yes |