Key Differences
In short — Core i9-10850K outperforms the cheaper Core i7-860 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i7-860 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-10850K is 3975 days newer than the cheaper Core i7-860.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-860
- Up to 83% cheaper than Core i9-10850K - $35.09 vs $204.0
- Up to 81% better value when playing Elden Ring than Core i9-10850K - $0.35 vs $1.81 per FPS
- Consumes up to 24% less energy than Intel Core i9-10850K - 95 vs 125 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10850K
- Performs up to 14% better in Elden Ring than Core i7-860 - 125 vs 110 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-860 - 20 vs 8 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-860 doesn't have integrated graphics
Elden Ring
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Buy for €38.95 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 6349 minutes ago
Desktop • Jul 27th, 2020
FPS
125
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.81/FPS
19%
Price, €
€226.44
17%
FPS Winner
Buy for €226.44 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 6349 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Sep 8th, 2009
Desktop • Jul 27th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-860 | vs | Intel Core i9-10850K |
---|---|---|
Sep 8th, 2009 | Release Date | Jul 27th, 2020 |
Core i7 | Collection | Core i9 |
Lynnfield | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket 1156 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 10 |
8 | Threads | 20 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
3.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.2 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 125 W |
45 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
21.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |