Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i3-4150 outperforms the more expensive Core i7-860 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i3-4150 is 1696 days newer than the more expensive Core i7-860.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-860
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-4150 - 8 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i3-4150
- Performs up to 7% better in A Plague Tale: Requiem than Core i7-860 - 126 vs 118 FPS
- Up to 6% cheaper than Core i7-860 - $32.9 vs $35.09
- Up to 12% better value when playing A Plague Tale: Requiem than Core i7-860 - $0.29 vs $0.33 per FPS
- Consumes up to 43% less energy than Intel Core i7-860 - 54 vs 95 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-860 doesn't have integrated graphics
A Plague Tale: Requiem
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for €38.95 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 12155 minutes ago
Desktop • May 1st, 2014
FPS
126
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.29/FPS
100%
Price, €
€36.52
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €36.52 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 12156 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 8th, 2009
Desktop • May 1st, 2014
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-860 | vs | Intel Core i3-4150 |
---|---|---|
Sep 8th, 2009 | Release Date | May 1st, 2014 |
Core i7 | Collection | Core i3 |
Lynnfield | Codename | Haswell |
Intel Socket 1156 | Socket | Intel Socket 1150 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 2 |
8 | Threads | 4 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
3.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
95 W | TDP | 54 W |
45 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
21.0x | Multiplier | 25.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 4400 |
No | Overclockable | No |