Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Celeron G6900 outperforms the cheaper Core i7-860 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Celeron G6900 is 4501 days newer than the cheaper Core i7-860.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-860
- Up to 20% cheaper than Celeron G6900 - $35.09 vs $43.86
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G6900 - 8 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G6900
- Performs up to 37% better in Dirt 5 than Core i7-860 - 190 vs 139 FPS
- Up to 7% better value when playing Dirt 5 than Core i7-860 - $0.26 vs $0.28 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-860 doesn't have integrated graphics
Dirt 5
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Buy for €38.95 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 12714 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
FPS
190
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.26/FPS
100%
Price, €
€48.69
79%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €48.69 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 12713 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Sep 8th, 2009
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-860 | vs | Intel Celeron G6900 |
---|---|---|
Sep 8th, 2009 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2022 |
Core i7 | Collection | Celeron |
Lynnfield | Codename | Alder Lake |
Intel Socket 1156 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 2 |
8 | Threads | 2 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
3.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
95 W | TDP | Not Available |
45 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
21.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 710 |
No | Overclockable | No |