Key Differences
In short — Core i5-11600K outperforms Core i7-820QM on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-11600K is 4192 days newer than Core i7-820QM.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-820QM
- Consumes up to 64% less energy than Intel Core i5-11600K - 45 vs 125 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i5-11600K
- Performs up to 59% better in Cyberpunk 2077 than Core i7-820QM - 92 vs 58 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-820QM - 12 vs 8 threads
Cyberpunk 2077
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
RT Overdrive
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
92
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.59/FPS
100%
Price, €
€146.08
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €146.08 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 10710 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
RT Overdrive
Mobile • Sep 23rd, 2009
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-820QM | vs | Intel Core i5-11600K |
---|---|---|
Sep 23rd, 2009 | Release Date | Mar 16th, 2021 |
Core i7 | Collection | Core i5 |
Clarksfield | Codename | Rocket Lake |
Intel Socket G1 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 6 |
8 | Threads | 12 |
1.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
3.1 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.9 GHz |
45 W | TDP | 125 W |
45 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
13.0x | Multiplier | 39.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 750 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |