Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 7 2700 outperforms Core i7-820QM on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 7 2700 is 3130 days newer than Core i7-820QM.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-820QM
- Consumes up to 31% less energy than AMD Ryzen 7 2700 - 45 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 7 2700 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 7 2700
- Performs up to 12% better in Sea of Thieves than Core i7-820QM - 226 vs 202 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-820QM - 16 vs 8 threads
Sea of Thieves
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Mythical
Desktop • Apr 19th, 2018
FPS
226
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.66/FPS
100%
Price, €
€150.15
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €150.15 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 31 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Mythical
Mobile • Sep 23rd, 2009
Desktop • Apr 19th, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-820QM | vs | AMD Ryzen 7 2700 |
---|---|---|
Sep 23rd, 2009 | Release Date | Apr 19th, 2018 |
Core i7 | Collection | Ryzen 7 |
Clarksfield | Codename | Pinnacle Ridge |
Intel Socket G1 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 8 |
8 | Threads | 16 |
1.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
3.1 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.1 GHz |
45 W | TDP | 65 W |
45 nm | Process Size | 12 nm |
13.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |