Key Differences
In short — Core i9-13900F outperforms the cheaper Core i7-8086K on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i7-8086K is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-13900F is 1674 days newer than the cheaper Core i7-8086K.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-8086K
- Up to 52% cheaper than Core i9-13900F - $148.43 vs $307.06
- Up to 44% better value when playing Valorant than Core i9-13900F - $0.2 vs $0.36 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-13900F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i9-13900F
- Performs up to 18% better in Valorant than Core i7-8086K - 949 vs 806 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-8086K - 32 vs 12 threads
Valorant
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Jun 5th, 2018
FPS
806
84.93150684931507%
Value, €/FPS
€0.2/FPS
100%
Price, €
€164.76
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €164.76 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 68 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
FPS
949
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.36/FPS
55.55555555555556%
Price, €
€340.84
48%
FPS Winner
Buy for €340.84 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 66 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Jun 5th, 2018
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Jun 5th, 2018
Single-Core
1673
61.282051282051285%
Multi-Core
6973
40.49596376096173%
Intel Core i7-8086K | vs | Intel Core i9-13900F |
---|---|---|
Jun 5th, 2018 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
Core i7 40th | Collection | Core i9 |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 24 |
12 | Threads | 32 |
4.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.0 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.6 GHz |
Not Available | TDP | Not Available |
14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
40.0x | Multiplier | 20.0x |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |