Key Differences
In short — Core i7-8086K outperforms the cheaper Core i5-10400F on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-10400F is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-8086K is 695 days older than the cheaper Core i5-10400F.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-8086K
- Performs up to 1% better in Red Dead Redemption 2 than Core i5-10400F - 161 vs 159 FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-10400F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i5-10400F
- Up to 62% cheaper than Core i7-8086K - $71.3 vs $186.45
- Up to 61% better value when playing Red Dead Redemption 2 than Core i7-8086K - $0.5 vs $1.29 per FPS
Red Dead Redemption 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Buy for €206.96 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 90 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
159
98%
Value, €/FPS
€0.5/FPS
100%
Price, €
€79.14
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €79.14 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 90 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Jun 5th, 2018
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-8086K | vs | Intel Core i5-10400F |
---|---|---|
Jun 5th, 2018 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Core i7 40th | Collection | Core i5 |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 6 |
12 | Threads | 12 |
4.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
Not Available | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
40.0x | Multiplier | 29.0x |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |