Buy on Amazon
€364.22
In Stock
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $425
Availability
MSRP in USD: $425
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short — Core i7-8086K outperforms the cheaper Celeron G1610 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G1610 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-8086K is 2010 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G1610.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-8086K
- Performs up to 4% better in Resident Evil Village than Celeron G1610 - 304 vs 291 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1610 - 12 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1610
- Up to 92% cheaper than Core i7-8086K - $27.05 vs $328.13
- Up to 92% better value when playing Resident Evil Village than Core i7-8086K - $0.1 vs $1.2 per FPS
Resident Evil Village
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Max
Intel Core i7-8086K Desktop Processor 6 Cores up to 5.0 GHz unlocked LGA 1151 300 Series 95W
Buy for €364.22 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 105 minutes ago
Celeron G1610
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
FPS
291
95%
Value, €/FPS
€0.1/FPS
100%
Price, €
€30.03
100%
Value Winner
Intel Celeron G1610 2.60GHz LGA 1155 Processor BX80637G1610
Buy for €30.03 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 104 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Max
Core i7-8086K
Desktop • Jun 5th, 2018
Celeron G1610
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-8086K | vs | Intel Celeron G1610 |
|---|---|---|
Jun 5th, 2018 | Release Date | Dec 3rd, 2012 |
| Core i7 40th | Collection | Celeron |
| Coffee Lake | Codename | Ivy Bridge |
| Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 2 |
12 | Threads | 2 |
4.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.6 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
| Not Available | TDP | 55 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
40.0x | Multiplier | 26.0x |
| UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD |
Yes | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.