Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i9-10900F outperforms the more expensive Core i7-7820X on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i9-10900F is 1039 days newer than the more expensive Core i7-7820X.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10900F
- Performs up to 3% better in Overwatch 2 than Core i7-7820X - 360 vs 349 FPS
- Up to 55% cheaper than Core i7-7820X - $164.51 vs $362.79
- Up to 56% better value when playing Overwatch 2 than Core i7-7820X - $0.51 vs $1.15 per FPS
- Consumes up to 54% less energy than Intel Core i7-7820X - 65 vs 140 Watts
Overwatch 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Buy for €402.7 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 17046 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
360
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.51/FPS
100%
Price, €
€182.61
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €182.61 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 17046 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Jun 26th, 2017
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-7820X | vs | Intel Core i9-10900F |
---|---|---|
Jun 26th, 2017 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Core i7 | Collection | Core i9 |
Skylake-E/EP | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket 2066 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 10 |
16 | Threads | 20 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
4.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.2 GHz |
140 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 28.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |