Key Differences
In short — Core i7-7820X outperforms the cheaper Core i5-8400 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-8400 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-7820X is 101 days older than the cheaper Core i5-8400.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-7820X
- Performs up to 3% better in The Callisto Protocol than Core i5-8400 - 116 vs 113 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-8400 - 16 vs 6 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i5-8400
- Up to 74% cheaper than Core i7-7820X - $83.35 vs $325.38
- Up to 74% better value when playing The Callisto Protocol than Core i7-7820X - $0.82 vs $3.11 per FPS
- Consumes up to 54% less energy than Intel Core i7-7820X - 65 vs 140 Watts
The Callisto Protocol
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jun 26th, 2017
FPS
116
100%
Value, €/FPS
€3.11/FPS
26%
Price, €
€361.17
25%
FPS Winner
Buy for €361.17 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 3 minutes ago
Desktop • Oct 5th, 2017
FPS
113
97%
Value, €/FPS
€0.82/FPS
100%
Price, €
€92.52
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €92.52 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 3 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jun 26th, 2017
Desktop • Oct 5th, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-7820X | vs | Intel Core i5-8400 |
---|---|---|
Jun 26th, 2017 | Release Date | Oct 5th, 2017 |
Core i7 | Collection | Core i5 |
Skylake-E/EP | Codename | Coffee Lake |
Intel Socket 2066 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 6 |
16 | Threads | 6 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
4.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
140 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 28.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |