Buy on Amazon
€361.17
In Stock
Availability
Availability
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short — Core i7-7820X outperforms the cheaper Celeron G3900 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G3900 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-7820X is 664 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G3900.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-7820X
- Performs up to 149% better in League of Legends than Celeron G3900 - 167 vs 67 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G3900 - 16 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3900
- Up to 84% cheaper than Core i7-7820X - $51.18 vs $325.38
- Up to 61% better value when playing League of Legends than Core i7-7820X - $0.85 vs $2.16 per FPS
- Consumes up to 64% less energy than Intel Core i7-7820X - 51 vs 140 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-7820X doesn't have integrated graphics
League of Legends
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Core i7-7820X
Desktop • Jun 26th, 2017
FPS
167
100%
Value, €/FPS
€2.16/FPS
39%
Price, €
€361.17
15%
FPS Winner
Intel Core i7 i7-7820X Octa-core 8 Core 3.60 GHz Processor Socket R4 LGA-2066
Buy for €361.17 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 66 minutes ago
Celeron G3900
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
FPS
67
40%
Value, €/FPS
€0.85/FPS
100%
Price, €
€56.81
100%
Value Winner
Intel CPU BX80662G3900 Celeron G3900 2.80Ghz 2M LGA1151 2C/2T Skylake Retail
Buy for €56.81 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 65 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Core i7-7820X
Desktop • Jun 26th, 2017
Celeron G3900
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-7820X | vs | Intel Celeron G3900 |
|---|---|---|
Jun 26th, 2017 | Release Date | Sep 1st, 2015 |
| Core i7 | Collection | Celeron |
| Skylake-E/EP | Codename | Skylake |
| Intel Socket 2066 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 2 |
16 | Threads | 2 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
| 4.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
| 140 W | TDP | 51 W |
| 14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 28.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 510 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.