Key Differences
In short — Core i7-7820X outperforms the cheaper Ryzen Threadripper 2920X on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Ryzen Threadripper 2920X is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-7820X is 464 days older than the cheaper Ryzen Threadripper 2920X.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-7820X
- Performs up to 2% better in Star Wars Jedi: Survivor than Ryzen Threadripper 2920X - 128 vs 125 FPS
- Consumes up to 22% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X - 140 vs 180 Watts
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X
- Up to 60% cheaper than Core i7-7820X - $144.51 vs $362.79
- Up to 59% better value when playing Star Wars Jedi: Survivor than Core i7-7820X - $1.28 vs $3.15 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-7820X - 24 vs 16 threads
Star Wars Jedi: Survivor
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Buy for €402.7 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 13363 minutes ago
Desktop • Oct 3rd, 2018
FPS
125
97%
Value, €/FPS
€1.28/FPS
100%
Price, €
€160.41
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €160.41 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 13363 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Jun 26th, 2017
Desktop • Oct 3rd, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-7820X | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X |
---|---|---|
Jun 26th, 2017 | Release Date | Oct 3rd, 2018 |
Core i7 | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Skylake-E/EP | Codename | Colfax |
Intel Socket 2066 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 12 |
16 | Threads | 24 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
4.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
140 W | TDP | 180 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 12 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |