Key Differences
In short — Core i9-13900KS outperforms the cheaper Core i7-7700T on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i7-7700T is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-13900KS is 2200 days newer than the cheaper Core i7-7700T.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-7700T
- Up to 74% cheaper than Core i9-13900KS - $109.68 vs $424.05
- Up to 62% better value when playing Rust than Core i9-13900KS - $0.65 vs $1.71 per FPS
- Consumes up to 77% less energy than Intel Core i9-13900KS - 35 vs 150 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i9-13900KS
- Performs up to 48% better in Rust than Core i7-7700T - 276 vs 187 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-7700T - 32 vs 8 threads
Rust
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
FPS
187
67%
Value, €/FPS
€0.65/FPS
100%
Price, €
€121.75
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €121.75 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 37 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 12th, 2023
FPS
276
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.71/FPS
38%
Price, €
€470.7
25%
FPS Winner
Buy for €470.7 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 36 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Desktop • Jan 12th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-7700T | vs | Intel Core i9-13900KS |
---|---|---|
Jan 3rd, 2017 | Release Date | Jan 12th, 2023 |
Core i7 | Collection | Core i9 |
Kaby Lake | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 24 |
8 | Threads | 32 |
2.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
3.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 6.0 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 150 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
29.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
HD 630 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |