Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i5-10400F outperforms the more expensive Core i7-7700T on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i5-10400F is 1213 days newer than the more expensive Core i7-7700T.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-7700T
- Consumes up to 46% less energy than Intel Core i5-10400F - 35 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-10400F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i5-10400F
- Performs up to 5% better in Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege than Core i7-7700T - 562 vs 536 FPS
- Up to 27% cheaper than Core i7-7700T - $80.0 vs $109.68
- Up to 30% better value when playing Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege than Core i7-7700T - $0.16 vs $0.23 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-7700T - 12 vs 8 threads
Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for €121.75 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 104 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
562
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.16/FPS
100%
Price, €
€88.8
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €88.8 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 104 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-7700T | vs | Intel Core i5-10400F |
---|---|---|
Jan 3rd, 2017 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Core i7 | Collection | Core i5 |
Kaby Lake | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 6 |
8 | Threads | 12 |
2.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
3.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
29.0x | Multiplier | 29.0x |
HD 630 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |