Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i3-9100 outperforms the more expensive Core i7-7700T on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i3-9100 is 606 days newer than the more expensive Core i7-7700T.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-7700T
- Consumes up to 46% less energy than Intel Core i3-9100 - 35 vs 65 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-9100 - 8 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i3-9100
- Performs up to 5% better in Starfield than Core i7-7700T - 58 vs 55 FPS
- Up to 3% cheaper than Core i7-7700T - $106.02 vs $109.68
- Up to 8% better value when playing Starfield than Core i7-7700T - $2.03 vs $2.21 per FPS
Starfield
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for €121.75 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 220 minutes ago
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2018
FPS
58
100%
Value, €/FPS
€2.03/FPS
100%
Price, €
€117.68
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €117.68 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 220 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-7700T | vs | Intel Core i3-9100 |
---|---|---|
Jan 3rd, 2017 | Release Date | Sep 1st, 2018 |
Core i7 | Collection | Core i3 |
Kaby Lake | Codename | Coffee Lake |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 4 |
8 | Threads | 4 |
2.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
3.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
29.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
HD 630 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
No | Overclockable | No |