Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 7 2700 outperforms the cheaper Core i7-7700T on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i7-7700T is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 7 2700 is 471 days newer than the cheaper Core i7-7700T.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-7700T
- Up to 19% cheaper than Ryzen 7 2700 - $109.68 vs $135.27
- Up to 19% better value when playing Assassin's Creed Valhalla than Ryzen 7 2700 - $0.7 vs $0.86 per FPS
- Consumes up to 46% less energy than AMD Ryzen 7 2700 - 35 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 7 2700 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 7 2700
- Performs up to 1% better in Assassin's Creed Valhalla than Core i7-7700T - 174 vs 173 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-7700T - 16 vs 8 threads
Assassin's Creed Valhalla
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
FPS
173
99%
Value, €/FPS
€0.7/FPS
100%
Price, €
€121.75
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €121.75 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 111 minutes ago
Buy for €150.15 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 112 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Desktop • Apr 19th, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-7700T | vs | AMD Ryzen 7 2700 |
---|---|---|
Jan 3rd, 2017 | Release Date | Apr 19th, 2018 |
Core i7 | Collection | Ryzen 7 |
Kaby Lake | Codename | Pinnacle Ridge |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 8 |
8 | Threads | 16 |
2.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
3.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.1 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 12 nm |
29.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
HD 630 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |