Buy on Amazon
€121.75
In Stock
Availability
Availability
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $149
Availability
MSRP in USD: $149
Key Differences
In short — Core i7-7700T outperforms the cheaper Ryzen 5 3400G on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Ryzen 5 3400G is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-7700T is 915 days older than the cheaper Ryzen 5 3400G.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-7700T
- Performs up to 7% better in Immortals of Aveum than Ryzen 5 3400G - 46 vs 43 FPS
- Consumes up to 46% less energy than AMD Ryzen 5 3400G - 35 vs 65 Watts
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 3400G
- Up to 35% cheaper than Core i7-7700T - $71.65 vs $109.68
- Up to 30% better value when playing Immortals of Aveum than Core i7-7700T - $1.85 vs $2.65 per FPS
Immortals of Aveum
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Intel Core i7 i7-7700T Quad-core (4 Core) 2.90 GHz Processor - Socket H4 LGA-1151OEM Pack - 1 MB
Buy for €121.75 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 100 minutes ago
Ryzen 5 3400G
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
FPS
43
93%
Value, €/FPS
€1.85/FPS
100%
Price, €
€79.53
100%
Value Winner
AMD Ryzen 5 3400G 4-core, 8-Thread Unlocked Desktop Processor with Radeon RX Graphics
Buy for €79.53 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 100 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Core i7-7700T
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Ryzen 5 3400G
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-7700T | vs | AMD Ryzen 5 3400G |
|---|---|---|
| Jan 3rd, 2017 | Release Date | Jul 7th, 2019 |
| Core i7 | Collection | Ryzen 5 |
| Kaby Lake | Codename | Picasso |
| Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 4 | Cores | 4 |
| 8 | Threads | 8 |
| 2.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
| 3.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 65 W |
| 14 nm | Process Size | 12 nm |
| 29.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
| HD 630 | Integrated Graphics | Radeon RX Vega 11 |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.