Key Differences
In short — Core i7-7700K outperforms the cheaper Core i3-9100F on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-9100F is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-7700K is 840 days older than the cheaper Core i3-9100F.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-7700K
- Performs up to 4% better in Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 than Core i3-9100F - 110 vs 106 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-9100F - 8 vs 4 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i3-9100F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i3-9100F
- Up to 75% cheaper than Core i7-7700K - $41.67 vs $168.18
- Up to 74% better value when playing Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 than Core i7-7700K - $0.44 vs $1.7 per FPS
- Consumes up to 29% less energy than Intel Core i7-7700K - 65 vs 91 Watts
Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for €186.68 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 5589 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
FPS
106
96%
Value, €/FPS
€0.44/FPS
100%
Price, €
€46.25
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €46.25 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 5589 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-7700K | vs | Intel Core i3-9100F |
---|---|---|
Jan 3rd, 2017 | Release Date | Apr 23rd, 2019 |
Core i7 | Collection | Core i3 |
Kaby Lake | Codename | Coffee Lake |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 4 |
8 | Threads | 4 |
4.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
4.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
91 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
42.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
HD 630 | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |