Key Differences
In short — Core i7-7700K outperforms the cheaper Core i3-10320 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-10320 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-7700K is 1213 days older than the cheaper Core i3-10320.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-7700K
- Performs up to 1% better in Assassin's Creed Valhalla than Core i3-10320 - 177 vs 176 FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i3-10320
- Up to 5% cheaper than Core i7-7700K - $102.36 vs $108.01
- Up to 4% better value when playing Assassin's Creed Valhalla than Core i7-7700K - $0.65 vs $0.68 per FPS
- Consumes up to 29% less energy than Intel Core i7-7700K - 65 vs 91 Watts
Assassin's Creed Valhalla
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
FPS
177
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.68/FPS
95.58823529411764%
Price, €
€119.89
94%
FPS Winner
Buy for €119.89 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 1565 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
176
99.43502824858757%
Value, €/FPS
€0.65/FPS
100%
Price, €
€113.62
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €113.62 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 1569 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Single-Core
1539
97.96308084022915%
Multi-Core
4626
90.61704211557297%
Intel Core i7-7700K | vs | Intel Core i3-10320 |
---|---|---|
Jan 3rd, 2017 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Core i7 | Collection | Core i3 |
Kaby Lake | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 4 |
8 | Threads | 8 |
4.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
4.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.6 GHz |
91 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
42.0x | Multiplier | 38.0x |
HD 630 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |