Key Differences
In short — Core i5-13400F outperforms the cheaper Core i7-7700 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i7-7700 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-13400F is 2192 days newer than the cheaper Core i7-7700.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-7700
- Up to 81% cheaper than Core i5-13400F - $122.11 vs $658.06
- Up to 78% better value when playing New World than Core i5-13400F - $1.19 vs $5.29 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-13400F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i5-13400F
- Performs up to 21% better in New World than Core i7-7700 - 138 vs 114 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-7700 - 16 vs 8 threads
New World
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
FPS
114
82%
Value, €/FPS
€1.19/FPS
100%
Price, €
€135.54
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €135.54 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 63 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
FPS
138
100%
Value, €/FPS
€5.29/FPS
22%
Price, €
€730.45
18%
FPS Winner
Buy for €730.45 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 70 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-7700 | vs | Intel Core i5-13400F |
---|---|---|
Jan 3rd, 2017 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
Core i7 | Collection | Core i5 |
Kaby Lake | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 10 |
8 | Threads | 16 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.5 GHz |
4.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.6 GHz |
65 W | TDP | Not Available |
14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 25.0x |
HD 630 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |