Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i5-11600KF outperforms the more expensive Core i7-7700 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i5-11600KF is 1533 days newer than the more expensive Core i7-7700.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-7700
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than Intel Core i5-11600KF - 65 vs 125 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-11600KF doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i5-11600KF
- Performs up to 2% better in Tom Clancy’s The Division 2 than Core i7-7700 - 239 vs 234 FPS
- Up to 1% cheaper than Core i7-7700 - $121.27 vs $122.11
- Up to 3% better value when playing Tom Clancy’s The Division 2 than Core i7-7700 - $0.56 vs $0.58 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-7700 - 12 vs 8 threads
Tom Clancy’s The Division 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for €135.54 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 15108 minutes ago
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
239
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.56/FPS
100%
Price, €
€134.61
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €134.61 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 15108 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-7700 | vs | Intel Core i5-11600KF |
---|---|---|
Jan 3rd, 2017 | Release Date | Mar 16th, 2021 |
Core i7 | Collection | Core i5 |
Kaby Lake | Codename | Rocket Lake |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 6 |
8 | Threads | 12 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
4.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.9 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 125 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 39.0x |
HD 630 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |