Buy on Amazon
€145.38
In Stock
Availability
Availability
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short — Core i7-7700 outperforms the cheaper Core i3-7100T on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-7100T is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-7700 and the cheaper Core i3-7100T have been released at the same time.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-7700
- Performs up to 2% better in DOOM Eternal than Core i3-7100T - 487 vs 476 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-7100T - 8 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i3-7100T
- Up to 58% cheaper than Core i7-7700 - $54.84 vs $130.97
- Up to 57% better value when playing DOOM Eternal than Core i7-7700 - $0.13 vs $0.3 per FPS
- Consumes up to 46% less energy than Intel Core i7-7700 - 35 vs 65 Watts
DOOM Eternal
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Nightmare
Core i7-7700
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
FPS
487
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.3/FPS
43.333333333333336%
Price, €
€145.38
41%
FPS Winner
Intel Core i7-7700 Desktop Processor 4 Cores up to 4.2 GHz LGA 1151 100/200 Series 65W
Buy for €145.38 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 21 minutes ago
Core i3-7100T
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
FPS
476
97.74127310061603%
Value, €/FPS
€0.13/FPS
100%
Price, €
€60.87
100%
Value Winner
Intel Core i3 i3-7100T Dual-Core (2 Core) 3.40 GHz Processor - Socket H4 LGA-1151OEM Pack - 512 KB
Buy for €60.87 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 21 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Nightmare
Core i7-7700
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Core i3-7100T
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i3-7100T
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Single-Core
1116
80.34557235421165%
Multi-Core
2260
50.672645739910315%
Intel Core i7-7700 | vs | Intel Core i3-7100T |
|---|---|---|
| Jan 3rd, 2017 | Release Date | Jan 3rd, 2017 |
| Core i7 | Collection | Core i3 |
| Kaby Lake | Codename | Kaby Lake |
| Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 2 |
8 | Threads | 4 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
| 4.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
| 65 W | TDP | 35 W |
| 14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
| HD 630 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 630 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.