Key Differences
In short — Core i7-11800H outperforms Core i7-720QM on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i7-11800H is 4248 days newer than Core i7-720QM.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-11800H
- Performs up to 32% better in Star Wars Jedi: Survivor than Core i7-720QM - 139 vs 105 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-720QM - 16 vs 8 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-720QM doesn't have integrated graphics
Star Wars Jedi: Survivor
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Core i7-720QM
Mobile • Sep 23rd, 2009
Core i7-11800H
Mobile • May 11th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-720QM | vs | Intel Core i7-11800H |
|---|---|---|
| Sep 23rd, 2009 | Release Date | May 11th, 2021 |
| Core i7 | Collection | Core i7 |
| Clarksfield | Codename | Tiger Lake |
| Intel Socket G1 | Socket | Intel BGA 1787 |
Mobile | Segment | Mobile |
| 4 | Cores | 8 |
| 8 | Threads | 16 |
| 1.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.3 GHz |
| 2.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.6 GHz |
| 45 W | TDP | 45 W |
| 45 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
| 12.0x | Multiplier | 19.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 750 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
