Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i9-10900F outperforms the more expensive Core i7-6950X on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i9-10900F is 1430 days newer than the more expensive Core i7-6950X.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10900F
- Performs up to 3% better in Elden Ring than Core i7-6950X - 124 vs 120 FPS
- Up to 44% cheaper than Core i7-6950X - $182.8 vs $328.3
- Up to 46% better value when playing Elden Ring than Core i7-6950X - $1.64 vs $3.04 per FPS
- Consumes up to 54% less energy than Intel Core i7-6950X - 65 vs 140 Watts
Elden Ring
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Buy for €364.41 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 50 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
124
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.64/FPS
100%
Price, €
€202.91
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €202.91 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 49 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • May 31st, 2016
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-6950X | vs | Intel Core i9-10900F |
---|---|---|
May 31st, 2016 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Core i7 | Collection | Core i9 |
Broadwell-E | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket 2011-3 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
10 | Cores | 10 |
20 | Threads | 20 |
3.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
3.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.2 GHz |
140 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
30.0x | Multiplier | 28.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |