Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i7-6900K outperforms the more expensive Core i3-8100T on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i7-6900K is 671 days older than the more expensive Core i3-8100T.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-6900K
- Performs up to 1% better in The Outer Worlds than Core i3-8100T - 203 vs 201 FPS
- Up to 41% cheaper than Core i3-8100T - $87.75 vs $149.16
- Up to 41% better value when playing The Outer Worlds than Core i3-8100T - $0.48 vs $0.82 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-8100T - 16 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i3-8100T
- Consumes up to 75% less energy than Intel Core i7-6900K - 35 vs 140 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-6900K doesn't have integrated graphics
The Outer Worlds
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • May 31st, 2016
FPS
203
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.48/FPS
100%
Price, €
€97.4
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €97.4 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 153 minutes ago
Buy for €165.57 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 154 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • May 31st, 2016
Desktop • Apr 2nd, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-6900K | vs | Intel Core i3-8100T |
---|---|---|
May 31st, 2016 | Release Date | Apr 2nd, 2018 |
Core i7 | Collection | Core i3 |
Broadwell-E | Codename | Coffee Lake |
Intel Socket 2011-3 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 4 |
16 | Threads | 4 |
3.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.1 GHz |
3.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
140 W | TDP | 35 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
32.0x | Multiplier | 31.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |