Key Differences
In short — Core i9-14900F outperforms the cheaper Core i7-6800K on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i7-6800K is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-14900F is 2778 days newer than the cheaper Core i7-6800K.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-6800K
- Up to 81% cheaper than Core i9-14900F - $75.31 vs $386.79
- Up to 79% better value when playing Red Dead Redemption 2 than Core i9-14900F - $0.53 vs $2.56 per FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i9-14900F
- Performs up to 7% better in Red Dead Redemption 2 than Core i7-6800K - 168 vs 157 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-6800K - 32 vs 12 threads
Red Dead Redemption 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • May 31st, 2016
FPS
157
93%
Value, €/FPS
€0.53/FPS
100%
Price, €
€83.59
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €83.59 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 27 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
FPS
168
100%
Value, €/FPS
€2.56/FPS
20%
Price, €
€429.34
19%
FPS Winner
Buy for €429.34 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 25 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • May 31st, 2016
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-6800K | vs | Intel Core i9-14900F |
---|---|---|
May 31st, 2016 | Release Date | Jan 8th, 2024 |
Core i7 | Collection | Core i9 |
Broadwell-E | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 2011-3 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 24 |
12 | Threads | 32 |
3.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.0 GHz |
3.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.8 GHz |
140 W | TDP | Not Available |
14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
34.0x | Multiplier | 20.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |