Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i7-6800K outperforms the more expensive Core i3-3220 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i7-6800K is 1366 days newer than the more expensive Core i3-3220.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-6800K
- Performs up to 3% better in Stray than Core i3-3220 - 183 vs 177 FPS
- Up to 2% cheaper than Core i3-3220 - $65.81 vs $67.25
- Up to 5% better value when playing Stray than Core i3-3220 - $0.4 vs $0.42 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-3220 - 12 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i3-3220
- Consumes up to 61% less energy than Intel Core i7-6800K - 55 vs 140 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-6800K doesn't have integrated graphics
Stray
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • May 31st, 2016
FPS
183
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.4/FPS
100%
Price, €
€73.05
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €73.05 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 33 minutes ago
Desktop • Sep 3rd, 2012
FPS
177
96.72131147540983%
Value, €/FPS
€0.42/FPS
95.23809523809524%
Price, €
€74.65
97%
Buy for €74.65 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 31 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • May 31st, 2016
Desktop • Sep 3rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-6800K | vs | Intel Core i3-3220 |
---|---|---|
May 31st, 2016 | Release Date | Sep 3rd, 2012 |
Core i7 | Collection | Core i3 |
Broadwell-E | Codename | Ivy Bridge |
Intel Socket 2011-3 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 2 |
12 | Threads | 4 |
3.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
3.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
140 W | TDP | 55 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
34.0x | Multiplier | 33.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 2500 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |