Key Differences
In short — Core i7-6800K outperforms the cheaper Celeron G3930T on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G3930T is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-6800K is 217 days older than the cheaper Celeron G3930T.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-6800K
- Performs up to 10% better in Horizon Zero Dawn than Celeron G3930T - 170 vs 154 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G3930T - 12 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3930T
- Up to 62% cheaper than Core i7-6800K - $28.52 vs $75.31
- Up to 57% better value when playing Horizon Zero Dawn than Core i7-6800K - $0.21 vs $0.49 per FPS
- Consumes up to 75% less energy than Intel Core i7-6800K - 35 vs 140 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-6800K doesn't have integrated graphics
Horizon Zero Dawn
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultimate
Buy for €83.59 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 71 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
FPS
154
90%
Value, €/FPS
€0.21/FPS
100%
Price, €
€31.66
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €31.66 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 70 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultimate
Desktop • May 31st, 2016
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-6800K | vs | Intel Celeron G3930T |
---|---|---|
May 31st, 2016 | Release Date | Jan 3rd, 2017 |
Core i7 | Collection | Celeron |
Broadwell-E | Codename | Kaby Lake |
Intel Socket 2011-3 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 2 |
12 | Threads | 2 |
3.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.7 GHz |
3.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
140 W | TDP | 35 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
34.0x | Multiplier | 27.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 610 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |