Key Differences
In short — Core i9-10900F outperforms the cheaper Core i7-6700T on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-10900F is 1703 days newer than the cheaper Core i7-6700T.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-6700T
- Up to 59% cheaper than Core i9-10900F - $65.14 vs $159.4
- Consumes up to 46% less energy than Intel Core i9-10900F - 35 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-10900F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10900F
- Performs up to 2% better in Stray than Core i7-6700T - 185 vs 182 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-6700T - 20 vs 8 threads
Stray
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Buy for €72.3 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 75737 minutes ago
Buy for €176.93 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 75736 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Single-Core
1183
70.58472553699285%
Multi-Core
3566
42.32138618561595%
Intel Core i7-6700T | vs | Intel Core i9-10900F |
---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2015 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Core i7 | Collection | Core i9 |
Skylake | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 10 |
8 | Threads | 20 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
3.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.2 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
28.0x | Multiplier | 28.0x |
HD Graphics 530 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |