Buy on Amazon
€90.18
In Stock
Availability
Availability
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i5-8600 outperforms the more expensive Core i7-6700T on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i5-8600 is 897 days newer than the more expensive Core i7-6700T.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-6700T
- Consumes up to 46% less energy than Intel Core i5-8600 - 35 vs 65 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-8600 - 8 vs 6 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-8600 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i5-8600
- Performs up to 3% better in FINAL FANTASY XIV: Endwalker than Core i7-6700T - 250 vs 242 FPS
- Up to 6% cheaper than Core i7-6700T - $76.77 vs $81.24
- Up to 8% better value when playing FINAL FANTASY XIV: Endwalker than Core i7-6700T - $0.34 vs $0.37 per FPS
FINAL FANTASY XIV: Endwalker
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Core i7-6700T
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
FPS
242
96.8%
Value, €/FPS
€0.37/FPS
91.8918918918919%
Price, €
€90.18
94%
Intel Core i7-6700T 2.8GHz Tray CPU
Buy for €90.18 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 1595 minutes ago
Core i5-8600
Desktop • Feb 14th, 2018
FPS
250
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.34/FPS
100%
Price, €
€85.22
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Intel® Core™ i5-8600 Desktop Processor 6 Core up to 4.3GHz Turbo LGA1151 300 Series 65W
Buy for €85.22 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 1597 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Core i7-6700T
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Core i5-8600
Desktop • Feb 14th, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-6700T | vs | Intel Core i5-8600 |
|---|---|---|
| Sep 1st, 2015 | Release Date | Feb 14th, 2018 |
| Core i7 | Collection | Core i5 |
| Skylake | Codename | Coffee Lake |
| Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 4 | Cores | 6 |
8 | Threads | 6 |
| 2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.1 GHz |
| 3.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 65 W |
| 14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 28.0x | Multiplier | 31.0x |
HD Graphics 530 | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.