Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i3-12100F outperforms the more expensive Core i7-6700T on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i3-12100F is 2338 days newer than the more expensive Core i7-6700T.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-6700T
- Consumes up to 40% less energy than Intel Core i3-12100F - 35 vs 58 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i3-12100F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i3-12100F
- Performs up to 16% better in Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Core i7-6700T - 147 vs 127 FPS
- Up to 5% cheaper than Core i7-6700T - $69.45 vs $73.05
- Up to 19% better value when playing Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Core i7-6700T - $0.52 vs $0.64 per FPS
Dying Light 2: Stay Human
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Buy for €81.08 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 16132 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 25th, 2022
FPS
147
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.52/FPS
100%
Price, €
€77.09
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €77.09 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 16132 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Desktop • Jan 25th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-6700T | vs | Intel Core i3-12100F |
---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2015 | Release Date | Jan 25th, 2022 |
Core i7 | Collection | Core i3 |
Skylake | Codename | Alder Lake |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 4 |
8 | Threads | 8 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
3.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 58 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
28.0x | Multiplier | 33.0x |
HD Graphics 530 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |