Key Differences
In short — Core i3-10320 outperforms the cheaper Core i7-6700T on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i7-6700T is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i3-10320 is 1703 days newer than the cheaper Core i7-6700T.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-6700T
- Up to 21% cheaper than Core i3-10320 - $81.24 vs $102.36
- Up to 15% better value when playing Sea of Thieves than Core i3-10320 - $0.4 vs $0.47 per FPS
- Consumes up to 46% less energy than Intel Core i3-10320 - 35 vs 65 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i3-10320
- Performs up to 5% better in Sea of Thieves than Core i7-6700T - 240 vs 228 FPS
Sea of Thieves
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Mythical
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
FPS
228
95%
Value, €/FPS
€0.4/FPS
100%
Price, €
€90.18
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €90.18 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 267 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
240
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.47/FPS
85.10638297872342%
Price, €
€113.62
79%
FPS Winner
Buy for €113.62 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 264 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Mythical
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Single-Core
1183
76.86809616634179%
Multi-Core
3566
77.08603545179422%
Intel Core i7-6700T | vs | Intel Core i3-10320 |
---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2015 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Core i7 | Collection | Core i3 |
Skylake | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 4 |
8 | Threads | 8 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
3.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.6 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
28.0x | Multiplier | 38.0x |
HD Graphics 530 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
No | Overclockable | No |