Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Celeron G6900 outperforms the more expensive Core i7-6700T on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Celeron G6900 is 2317 days newer than the more expensive Core i7-6700T.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-6700T
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G6900 - 8 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G6900
- Performs up to 6% better in Total War: WARHAMMER III than Core i7-6700T - 179 vs 169 FPS
- Up to 60% cheaper than Core i7-6700T - $29.24 vs $73.05
- Up to 62% better value when playing Total War: WARHAMMER III than Core i7-6700T - $0.18 vs $0.48 per FPS
Total War: WARHAMMER III
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for €81.08 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 20 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
FPS
179
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.18/FPS
100%
Price, €
€32.46
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €32.46 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 19 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-6700T | vs | Intel Celeron G6900 |
---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2015 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2022 |
Core i7 | Collection | Celeron |
Skylake | Codename | Alder Lake |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 2 |
8 | Threads | 2 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
3.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
35 W | TDP | Not Available |
14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
28.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
HD Graphics 530 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 710 |
No | Overclockable | No |