Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper 2920X outperforms the cheaper Core i7-6700T on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i7-6700T is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper 2920X is 1128 days newer than the cheaper Core i7-6700T.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-6700T
- Up to 87% cheaper than Ryzen Threadripper 2920X - $73.05 vs $548.4
- Up to 87% better value when playing Far Cry 5 than Ryzen Threadripper 2920X - $0.4 vs $2.97 per FPS
- Consumes up to 81% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X - 35 vs 180 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X
- Performs up to 1% better in Far Cry 5 than Core i7-6700T - 205 vs 203 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-6700T - 24 vs 8 threads
Far Cry 5
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
FPS
203
99%
Value, €/FPS
€0.4/FPS
100%
Price, €
€81.08
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €81.08 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 10453 minutes ago
Desktop • Oct 3rd, 2018
FPS
205
100%
Value, €/FPS
€2.97/FPS
13%
Price, €
€608.72
13%
FPS Winner
Buy for €608.72 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 10456 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Desktop • Oct 3rd, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-6700T | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X |
---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2015 | Release Date | Oct 3rd, 2018 |
Core i7 | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Skylake | Codename | Colfax |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 12 |
8 | Threads | 24 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
3.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 180 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 12 nm |
28.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
HD Graphics 530 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |