Buy on Amazon
€89.37
In Stock
Availability
Availability
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $749
Availability
MSRP in USD: $749
Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 9 3950X outperforms the cheaper Core i7-6700T on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i7-6700T is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 9 3950X is 1546 days newer than the cheaper Core i7-6700T.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-6700T
- Up to 77% cheaper than Ryzen 9 3950X - $80.51 vs $355.32
- Up to 76% better value when playing Death Stranding than Ryzen 9 3950X - $0.41 vs $1.71 per FPS
- Consumes up to 67% less energy than AMD Ryzen 9 3950X - 35 vs 105 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 9 3950X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 9 3950X
- Performs up to 4% better in Death Stranding than Core i7-6700T - 230 vs 222 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-6700T - 32 vs 8 threads
Death Stranding
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Core i7-6700T
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
FPS
222
96.52173913043478%
Value, €/FPS
€0.41/FPS
100%
Price, €
€89.37
100%
Value Winner
Intel Core i7-6700T 2.8GHz Tray CPU
Buy for €89.37 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 54 minutes ago
Ryzen 9 3950X
Desktop • Nov 25th, 2019
FPS
230
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.71/FPS
23.976608187134502%
Price, €
€394.41
22%
FPS Winner
AMD Ryzen 9 3950X 16-Core, 32-Thread Unlocked Desktop Processor
Buy for €394.41 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 53 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Core i7-6700T
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Ryzen 9 3950X
Desktop • Nov 25th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i7-6700T
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Single-Core
1183
69.42488262910797%
Multi-Core
3566
33.339566192969336%
Intel Core i7-6700T | vs | AMD Ryzen 9 3950X |
|---|---|---|
| Sep 1st, 2015 | Release Date | Nov 25th, 2019 |
| Core i7 | Collection | Ryzen 9 |
| Skylake | Codename | Matisse |
| Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 4 | Cores | 16 |
| 8 | Threads | 32 |
| 2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
| 3.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.7 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 105 W |
| 14 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
| 28.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
HD Graphics 530 | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.