Key Differences
In short — Core i7-6700T outperforms the cheaper FX-4130 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-4130 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-6700T is 1100 days newer than the cheaper FX-4130.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-6700T
- Performs up to 8% better in Overwatch 2 than FX-4130 - 341 vs 317 FPS
- Consumes up to 72% less energy than AMD FX-4130 - 35 vs 125 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-4130 - 8 vs 4 threads
Advantages of AMD FX-4130
- Up to 77% cheaper than Core i7-6700T - $16.76 vs $73.05
- Up to 75% better value when playing Overwatch 2 than Core i7-6700T - $0.06 vs $0.24 per FPS
Overwatch 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Buy for €81.08 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 72 minutes ago
Buy for €18.6 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 71 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Desktop • Aug 27th, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-6700T | vs | AMD FX-4130 |
---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2015 | Release Date | Aug 27th, 2012 |
Core i7 | Collection | FX |
Skylake | Codename | Zambezi |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 4 |
8 | Threads | 4 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
3.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 125 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
28.0x | Multiplier | 19.0x |
HD Graphics 530 | Integrated Graphics | On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) |
No | Overclockable | Yes |