Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i7-6700K outperforms the more expensive Core i9-9920X on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i7-6700K is 1175 days older than the more expensive Core i9-9920X.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-6700K
- Performs up to 1% better in Battlefield IV than Core i9-9920X - 418 vs 415 FPS
- Up to 69% cheaper than Core i9-9920X - $131.61 vs $429.54
- Up to 70% better value when playing Battlefield IV than Core i9-9920X - $0.35 vs $1.15 per FPS
- Consumes up to 45% less energy than Intel Core i9-9920X - 91 vs 165 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-9920X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i9-9920X
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-6700K - 24 vs 8 threads
Battlefield IV
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Aug 1st, 2015
FPS
418
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.35/FPS
100%
Price, €
€146.09
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €146.09 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 85 minutes ago
Buy for €476.79 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 85 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Aug 1st, 2015
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-6700K | vs | Intel Core i9-9920X |
---|---|---|
Aug 1st, 2015 | Release Date | Oct 19th, 2018 |
Core i7 | Collection | Core i9 |
Skylake | Codename | Skylake |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 2066 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 12 |
8 | Threads | 24 |
4.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
4.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.4 GHz |
91 W | TDP | 165 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
40.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
HD Graphics 530 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |