Key Differences
In short — Core i9-11900F outperforms the cheaper Core i7-6700K on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i7-6700K is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-11900F is 2054 days newer than the cheaper Core i7-6700K.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-6700K
- Up to 14% cheaper than Core i9-11900F - $131.61 vs $153.55
- Up to 7% better value when playing A Plague Tale: Requiem than Core i9-11900F - $1.1 vs $1.18 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-11900F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i9-11900F
- Performs up to 8% better in A Plague Tale: Requiem than Core i7-6700K - 144 vs 133 FPS
- Consumes up to 29% less energy than Intel Core i7-6700K - 65 vs 91 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-6700K - 16 vs 8 threads
A Plague Tale: Requiem
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Aug 1st, 2015
FPS
133
92%
Value, €/FPS
€1.1/FPS
100%
Price, €
€146.09
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €146.09 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 18242 minutes ago
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
144
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.18/FPS
93%
Price, €
€170.44
85%
FPS Winner
Buy for €170.44 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 18242 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Aug 1st, 2015
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-6700K | vs | Intel Core i9-11900F |
---|---|---|
Aug 1st, 2015 | Release Date | Mar 16th, 2021 |
Core i7 | Collection | Core i9 |
Skylake | Codename | Rocket Lake |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 8 |
8 | Threads | 16 |
4.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.5 GHz |
4.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.2 GHz |
91 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
40.0x | Multiplier | 25.0x |
HD Graphics 530 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |