Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i3-10320 outperforms the more expensive Core i7-6700K on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i3-10320 is 1734 days newer than the more expensive Core i7-6700K.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-10320
- Performs up to 0% better in F1 22 than Core i7-6700K - 278 vs 277 FPS
- Up to 22% cheaper than Core i7-6700K - $102.36 vs $131.61
- Up to 23% better value when playing F1 22 than Core i7-6700K - $0.41 vs $0.53 per FPS
- Consumes up to 29% less energy than Intel Core i7-6700K - 65 vs 91 Watts
F1 22
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Aug 1st, 2015
FPS
277
99.64028776978418%
Value, €/FPS
€0.53/FPS
77.35849056603773%
Price, €
€146.09
77%
Buy for €146.09 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 61782 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
278
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.41/FPS
100%
Price, €
€113.62
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €113.62 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 61780 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Aug 1st, 2015
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-6700K | vs | Intel Core i3-10320 |
---|---|---|
Aug 1st, 2015 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Core i7 | Collection | Core i3 |
Skylake | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 4 |
8 | Threads | 8 |
4.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
4.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.6 GHz |
91 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
40.0x | Multiplier | 38.0x |
HD Graphics 530 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
No | Overclockable | No |