Key Differences
In short — Core i7-6700K outperforms the cheaper Celeron G3930T on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G3930T is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-6700K is 521 days older than the cheaper Celeron G3930T.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-6700K
- Performs up to 2% better in Control than Celeron G3930T - 202 vs 199 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G3930T - 8 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3930T
- Up to 78% cheaper than Core i7-6700K - $28.52 vs $131.61
- Up to 78% better value when playing Control than Core i7-6700K - $0.16 vs $0.72 per FPS
- Consumes up to 62% less energy than Intel Core i7-6700K - 35 vs 91 Watts
Control
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Buy for €146.09 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 176 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
FPS
199
98%
Value, €/FPS
€0.16/FPS
100%
Price, €
€31.66
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €31.66 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 175 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Aug 1st, 2015
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-6700K | vs | Intel Celeron G3930T |
---|---|---|
Aug 1st, 2015 | Release Date | Jan 3rd, 2017 |
Core i7 | Collection | Celeron |
Skylake | Codename | Kaby Lake |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 2 |
8 | Threads | 2 |
4.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.7 GHz |
4.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
91 W | TDP | 35 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
40.0x | Multiplier | 27.0x |
HD Graphics 530 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 610 |
No | Overclockable | No |