Key Differences
In short — Core i7-6700K outperforms the cheaper Celeron G1610 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G1610 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-6700K is 971 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G1610.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-6700K
- Performs up to 6% better in Battlefield 1 than Celeron G1610 - 243 vs 229 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1610 - 8 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1610
- Up to 79% cheaper than Core i7-6700K - $27.05 vs $131.61
- Up to 78% better value when playing Battlefield 1 than Core i7-6700K - $0.13 vs $0.6 per FPS
- Consumes up to 40% less energy than Intel Core i7-6700K - 55 vs 91 Watts
Battlefield 1
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for €146.09 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 192 minutes ago
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
FPS
229
94%
Value, €/FPS
€0.13/FPS
100%
Price, €
€30.03
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €30.03 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 191 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Aug 1st, 2015
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-6700K | vs | Intel Celeron G1610 |
---|---|---|
Aug 1st, 2015 | Release Date | Dec 3rd, 2012 |
Core i7 | Collection | Celeron |
Skylake | Codename | Ivy Bridge |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 2 |
8 | Threads | 2 |
4.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.6 GHz |
4.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
91 W | TDP | 55 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
40.0x | Multiplier | 26.0x |
HD Graphics 530 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD |
No | Overclockable | No |