Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i7-6700K outperforms the more expensive Ryzen Threadripper 1950X on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i7-6700K is 740 days older than the more expensive Ryzen Threadripper 1950X.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-6700K
- Performs up to 5% better in Horizon Zero Dawn than Ryzen Threadripper 1950X - 177 vs 169 FPS
- Up to 19% cheaper than Ryzen Threadripper 1950X - $131.61 vs $162.14
- Up to 22% better value when playing Horizon Zero Dawn than Ryzen Threadripper 1950X - $0.83 vs $1.06 per FPS
- Consumes up to 49% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X - 91 vs 180 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-6700K - 32 vs 8 threads
Horizon Zero Dawn
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultimate
Desktop • Aug 1st, 2015
FPS
177
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.83/FPS
100%
Price, €
€146.09
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €146.09 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 17441 minutes ago
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
FPS
169
95%
Value, €/FPS
€1.06/FPS
78%
Price, €
€179.98
81%
Buy for €179.98 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 17441 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultimate
Desktop • Aug 1st, 2015
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-6700K | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X |
---|---|---|
Aug 1st, 2015 | Release Date | Aug 10th, 2017 |
Core i7 | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Skylake | Codename | Whitehaven |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 16 |
8 | Threads | 32 |
4.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
4.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
91 W | TDP | 180 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
40.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
HD Graphics 530 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |