Key Differences
In short — Core i9-10900F outperforms the cheaper Core i7-6700 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i7-6700 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-10900F is 1765 days newer than the cheaper Core i7-6700.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-6700
- Up to 45% cheaper than Core i9-10900F - $87.75 vs $159.38
- Up to 43% better value when playing Ready or Not than Core i9-10900F - $0.37 vs $0.65 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-10900F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10900F
- Performs up to 4% better in Ready or Not than Core i7-6700 - 274 vs 263 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-6700 - 20 vs 8 threads
Ready or Not
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Buy for €97.4 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 15536 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
274
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.65/FPS
56%
Price, €
€176.91
55%
FPS Winner
Buy for €176.91 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 15540 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Jul 1st, 2015
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-6700 | vs | Intel Core i9-10900F |
---|---|---|
Jul 1st, 2015 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Core i7 | Collection | Core i9 |
Skylake | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 10 |
8 | Threads | 20 |
3.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.2 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
34.0x | Multiplier | 28.0x |
HD Graphics 530 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |